Childhood Obesity And Health Inequalities

Child rowdy Obesity And Health InequalitiesChildhood fleshiness is distributed disproportionately in different regions. Socio- frugal status, racial hosts, (lobstein et.al., 2006) being more putting surface in scorn expectary and morbidity be common in modester. Socio- frugal group in developed countries like U.K (Wilkison.R Marmot R) considering these several performers. Sociological mouldings strives to explain health inequalities in society which contributes to puerility corpulency.The second back report (exworthy 2003) identify inequalities in health and the (Acheson 1988a) concluded that socio-economic inequalities and this explore a mode with person vivification styles, socio-economic status (Dahlgreen social determinants whitehead 1991) with several form which explains the health inequalities includes-Individual deportment- lifestyle culture. In this individual behavior the food habits of the children plays an in-chief(postnominal) role in children from ge t down-income groups are more vulnerable to fleshiness collectable to high nutritionists calorie, high-fats in cheaper foods and limited physical operation ( Kumanjika 2008). In westernization or modern social trends snacking, beverages, fast foods in restaurants and restricted physical activity by parents contributes for prevalence of puerility obesity in higher income groups. In support for this comment ab issue physical activity level or sedentary activity levels by children have declined in U.K activity inactivity acts as domains to represent the prevalence of obesity (Gortmaker et., al)This individual behavior is chosen to avoid un rose-cheeked food habits, inactivity in children and to adopt healthy habits to overcome rickety-health. This individual behavior model provides explanation on life style or culture of the parentschildren and this avoids focus societal factors for childhood obesity. generally it is individualistic and change in behavior should not itself hea lth inequalities for plenty to explain childhood obesity. Other social factors are to be considered which contributes for some other model-The materialist Structuralist This model focuses on social factors and scantness as the main factors for ill health relating to child hood obesity In U.K children from imprint socio economic groups have slightly higher odds than children from higher income groups (Stamatkis et. Al., 2005).Statically evidence shows that children from lower income groups accounts for (31%) to the child hood obesity (Wardle et al.,2006). This explanation supports pauperisation, as the main suit for ill health in children of the lower social groups. The morbidity range are stable from 19th atomic number 6 in low socio economic castes and even started unexpectedly increasing from last years of 20th century (Mackenbach.P.J 2006).The government stated no existence of poverty in Britain as consumer durable ownership is even high in low income groups (Goodman et . al., 1997).This account failed by Breadline Britain Surveys which evidenced 20% households are below poverty line (Gordon 1997). This explanation contributes information to government to focus on low social classes to improve the living standards to overcome ill health in children. This explanation is supported by Marmot review report- The social gradient of health inequality evidences if lower socio economic status the poorer is the health with inter related to factors like- unemployment, housing etc.,(Marmot Review cover up 2010). This explanation specifies that lack of resources, low wages, poverty are responsible for ill health in children and these factors are appear of control by the individual and to improve wages, resources to the working class vehemence on politics i.e., government is made which adopts a model Neo-Materialist model and this model emphasize on social, political, economic factors which affects the health and these are out of control of individual and includes outcomes from organizations like schools, fast food chains etc.,(White.K 2010). This determined to an approach by government in providing low fat snacks meals in schools. This materialistic model explanation is significant to explain about the capitalist country like U.K. The government is with increasing inequalities in health and income levels (Mackenbach P.J. 2006). This indicates that insurance policy making by the government should look after the wagestaxes of the working class. This explanation is supported by the fact that U.K poverty is reversed to 1930s from mid-eighties (Gordon 1997). And widened income levels in U.K from 1980s (Wilkinson R.G).This materialistic model has been expanded to life mannikin approach model- as the childhood obesity is underlying risk factor for chronic diseases like cardiac diseases, diabetes mellitus , hyper tension etc., ( Gortmaker.S.L et al., 1993) supported by childhood obesity continuous to adult and is affected by socio econ omic dowery (Viner M.R, Cole.T 2005).The materialistic model explanation indicates that individual health or behavior is strongly influenced by factors beyond the individuals control and this adopts a socio economic model (Acheson 1998a) lack resources in the society like unemployment, higher prices, low wages, lack of houses etc., are the social determinants which contributes to ill health (Wang 2004). This provides explanation on birth between individual and their surrounding studies suggests that social circumstances play an weighty role in individual behavior. Children from low socio economic status are more vulnerable to obesity due to faulty, cheaper food high calorie diet and limited physical activity. This lack of resources by parents of low income class obstructs children form healthy diet, physical activity and this support that the ill health, obesity is influenced by social circumstances rather than individual. The material resources is supported by Marmot Review Repo rt- The annual estimated cost of health inequalities is between 36 one thousand thousand to 40 billion and is with social justice for overcoming health inequalities (Marmot Review Report 2010). This supports that justice in material resources to lower income class overcomes health inequalities in further generation of children.The socio economic model explores in considering psychosocial factors for child hood obesity which is supported by children with obese mothers, lower cognitive stimulation, lower income levels are with increased risk for obesity. This psychological factors focus on low self-esteem, children with unhealthy behavior.Social processes that are involved in childhood obesity are concluded by formulating hypothesis Relative poverty cause on children child hood obesity, Living standards, family influence on childhood obesity, comparison of status by children in society.