Premchand’s Goodan and Dickens Hard Times Essay

There is always unremitting vox populi which brings Premchands Goodan and Dickens lowering quantify in framework as an entirety. Goodan which was written 1936, in a nutshell travels on the apprehension of a bearing of a farmer, most importantly onerousness in the hand of company structure. As a critic points fall out the look of Indian small town and the farmer seems to be trapped in the net woven by the landlords, moneylenders and police i. e. suggesting double standard of the capitalists.Dickens correspondingly voices well-disposed damage and problem in the capitalist framework most importantly oppression of the lower kinfolk by the upper phratry. A critic suggested that two the writers Premchand and Dickens primarily venerations to voicing the social reform, consciously trying to scoop up a balance between idealism and realism as a whole.In Hard Times which was written in 1854, fork outed victorian industrial society, and formulated a troop of radical critique o f industrial England. Siengfried A. Schulz in his book Premchand a western appraisal provided mainly one-third proposition drawn between Hard times and Goodan. In Hard Times 1) Injustice 2) Oppression of the poor by the upper class 3) Attack on the economic theorist, utilitarian. Again, in case of Goodan he proposes 1) deeply intrigued on the Question of Dharma. 2) Oppression of the poor by the rich. 3) Confinement of Premchand to depict the ugly aspect of Indian society. If we closely observe there seems to fight between two world world of fancy and world of incidentualism in Hard Times and world of village and city in Goodan.Goodan presents the bearing of Hori and his inclination towards religious ritual i. e. Goodan and his unable to forsake the judgment of his dharma and his life is doomed due to his adherence to it. The use of the term Dharma by Premchand gives the moving picture of a hollow ring suggesting hypocritical as well as. Hori, hopes that all other would empathize and naturally adhere to a traditional code of conduct, but his military posture is not reciprocated. This also gives a vibrant picture of problem of social hierarchy as a whole.In Hard Times too, the fact orient ideology of the characters like Gradgrind and Bounderby send word be seen as they contrasted any kind of fancy or imagination. Dickens represents utilitarian construct of adherence to fact which is dominant in the novel. Again, a critic points out that the marriage between Lusia- Bounderby can be connected with the character of Hori, as he too maries his elder daughter in marriage to an antique man, but the difference according to him is that it is Horis helplessness and trial that drives him towards this decision. whatever critic even points out that Premchands bringing out of this concept of marriage gives a parallel treatment of marriage as a whole for the western as well as Indian society. by dint of Hori, Premchand reveals the prospect of Indian farmer s big a warning that life of misery would continue until there is no change in the approach of Indian farmers towards his environment. Through Gradgrind and Bounderby, Dickens produced his product of representing the contemporary purely materialistic, scientifically readiness utilitarian theory.A critic posts Goodan far ahead of Hard Times as it seems more realistic then Hard Times. There is many instances like the Gradgrinds giving shelter to Sissy Jupe, and Horis giving shelter to Siliya which proposed Siegfrieds attempt of convincing that there can be possibility of borrowing ideas by Premchand Form Dickens. Again, there is also a possible analogy between lives of Stephen and Hori as both had extreme doctrine in life and simplicity and honesty are almost homogeneous to Horis dharma.Even their death brings out similarity as both dies with desires that are not fulfilled. Stephens fall symbolizes the destruction of the working class by industrial upper class and Horis death indi cates thrashing of the Indian peasant in the face of unbearable odd. There can be similar parallel between characters like Stephen- Richel and Mehta and Malti in Goodan. both limited roles, suggesting extra-marital affair.Through these characters Premchand represented the immergence of free thinking society. Mehta and Malti exposes Premchands idealism and Dickens depicted realistic form through Stephen and Richel. Premchand posesthe concept of westernization in the cities as well as Malti becomes the target of his sarcasm and satire too in Goodan. At last Tom and Gobar poises two portal of junction as Tom suggests natural and nasty influence of the fact oriented society.Gobar seems to be burdened by the approach of younger generation. Tom, like Gobar becomes the conjoin betwwn the two worlds. Dickens seems to be hopeful but Premchand exposes his pessimism, his loss of trustingness in the ability of the Indian psyche to overcome change. This voices the two writers concern in refo rming society. No matter how far youve gone down the wrongfulness road, turn back. Turkish Proverb